Are you fascinated by the topic of the origin of life?

The existence of symbols, or a system of symbols, that we commonly refer to as a code or scheme, presents compelling evidence against non-directed processes as the origin of life. It provokes deep questions about the fundamental nature of the universe and the likelihood of intelligent design.

At the heart of this enigma is the origin of information itself—a concept that requires an interpreter, a sender, and a receiver. Symbols are utilized to convey meaning beyond the medium by which they are stored or transmitted. This poses a critical question: if undirected material processes are incapable of generating a “code,” then what entity or mechanism is responsible? Moreover, does a common origin or cause underlie all codes observed in nature and technology

Codes are characterized by their arbitrary use of physical assets. Take binary data as an example: it represents small electronic (electromagnetic) charges in sets of eight (or more) bits to symbolize something other than the charges themselves. The key insight here is that while the code could theoretically be anything, in practice, it must adhere to a specific scheme—one consistent condition or pattern.


The development and standardization of such codes can be illustrated through the work of computer scientist Bob Bemer, who recognized the need for an “escape” character or condition to prevent runaway processes from overtaking a system. Bemer was also instrumental in defining numeric and alphanumeric characters in early computing. In his scheme, the TAB key is represented by the first and fourth bits, and the Carriage Return by the decimal number thirteen. There is no physical necessity dictating that these specific bits or numbers should correspond to these functions; Bemer’s choices were entirely arbitrary. Yet, his scheme became a standard, highlighting the role of intelligent choice in code creation.

http://archive.computerhistory.org/resources/access/text/finding-aids/102724781-Bemer/102724781-Bemer.pdf

For a code to function as an effective medium of information transmission, external agreement is essential. Both ASCII (the American Standard Code for Information Interchange) and DNA are symbolic schemes that require a schemer—an intelligence to design and utilize them. The act of linking a physical resource to a non-physical characteristic is a hallmark of intelligence.

When we turn our attention to DNA, the parallels with man-made codes become even more striking. DNA utilizes a four-bit system comprising the nucleotides Adenine (A), Guanine (G), Thymine (T), and Cytosine (C). These nucleotides form triplet codons, with each codon specifying a particular amino acid out of a possible twenty. These amino acids then assemble into linear strings that fold into complex shapes, forming the molecular machinery essential for life. The seemingly arbitrary and neutral condition of binary data in computing is mirrored in DNA, where nucleotides, unaware of their participation in a codon, do not influence their neighboring codons based on physical interactions.

The structure of DNA also reveals a higher level of complexity: triplet codons are organized into groups, and their arrangement influences not just the type of amino acids produced but also the timing and rate of protein synthesis. This demonstrates that codes can contain hierarchical layers—codes within codes—adding another layer of sophistication to the information system.

In conclusion, the existence of symbols and codes provides strong evidence against the notion that life originated through non-directed processes. This raises profound questions about the universe and the possibility of intelligent design. The neutrality and arbitrariness of binary data in computing find a direct analogue in the genetic code, where the arrangement of nucleotides determines biological outcomes without being dictated by their physical properties. The fact that triplet codons can influence developmental rates and production levels further underscores the complexity and intentionality behind these codes. Exploring these concepts pushes us to consider what other profound mysteries the universe may hold, and what further discoveries await in the fields of biology, information theory, and cosmology.

Back To Top